N9SEO  > SYSOP    26.01.25 22:30z 34 Lines 1403 Bytes #189 (0) @ WW
MID : 32129_N9SEO
Read: GUEST
Subj: Old bulletins???
Path: ED1ZAC<ED1ZAC<EA5URD
Sent: 250126/2220Z @:EA5URD.EAMU.ESP.EU #:8824 XFBB7.07 Bid:32129_N9SEO

R:250126/2215Z @:EA2RCF.EAVI.ESP.EU #:61211 [Vitoria] $:32129_N9SEO
R:250126/2215z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU $:32129_N9SEO
R:250126/2215Z @:N6RME.#NCA.CA.USA.NOAM #:23027 [El Dorado] $:32129_N9SEO
R:250126/2215Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:47603 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:32129_N9SEO
R:250126/2215Z @:OZ5BBS.FYN.DNK.EU #:15345 [Odense] $:32129_N9SEO
R:250126/2214Z @:PI8ZTM.#ZH1.NLD.EURO #:40579 [Zoetermeer] $:32129_N9SEO
R:250126/2202Z 22714@PY2BIL.SP.BRA.SOAM LinBPQ6.0.24
R:250126/2201Z 32129@N9SEO.#NAR.AR.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24

Hi,

Why are we getting OLD bulletins?  Do folks not reject/hold anything
older than 60 days? I thought that was the 'common' best practice on
this???? If not what is? Should not there be some limit to prevent
regurgitation of old news?  Or am I missing something else here?

Example of several I got today just got to me after hoping through 4
other systems upstream before they entered my hold queue.  

R:250126/2030Z 17763@VE2PKT.#TRV.QC.CAN.NOAM BPQ6.0.24
R:250126/2026Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:47600 [Salto] FBB7.00e
$:1470_KF5JRV
R:250126/1714Z 25300@N3HYM.#FRDK.MD.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.24
R:250126/1713Z 27457@W9GM.#SWWI.WI.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.24 R:241114/1105Z
19023@KC0GIS.#NCO.CO.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24 R:241114/1105Z
31922@KB5YZB.#NCO.CO.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.22 R:241114/1104Z
9273@W0ARP.#NCO.CO.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24 R:241114/1104Z
1470@KF5JRV.#NWAR.AR.USA.NA BPQ6.0.23


73 de n9seo
Kayne



Read previous mail | Read next mail