OpenBCM V1.06 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

ED1ZAC

[C.D.G. OpenBCM]

 Login: GUEST





  
G8MNY  > TECH     07.10.18 09:45l 256 Lines 11637 Bytes #2 (0) @ WW
BID : 40812_GB7CIP
Subj: Reducing Electronic RF QRM
Path: ED1ZAC<ED1ZAC<GB7CIP
Sent: 181007/0733Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO #:40812 [Caterham Surrey GBR]
From: G8MNY@GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO
To  : TECH@WW

By G8MNY                                        (Updated Aug 07)
(8 Bit ASCII graphics use code page 437 or 850, Terminal Font)

There are 3 principles to removing QRM & 1 for putting up with it.

  1/ Stop the RF being generated at the source. RFI Enforcement?

  2/ Stop Source RF from radiating.

  3/ Stop Rx system seeing the RF QRM.

  4/ Living with it.


1/ In electronic systems the use of radio frequencies is common, but the need
   for wideband signals is less common.

   Lets look at a logic gate that runs at 1MHz but uses a fast 40MHz totem pole
   output stage. This produces a high current power rail pulse @ > 120MHz on
   the switching edges.

        Gate     │      │   High bandwidth
      Current ───┴──────┴─── High QRM

                 +5V ──┬────
                       │_
     ______           │  `\      ______
    / 1MHz \_____   ──┤Gate├──  │      │____
    Low Bandwidth     │__./      40MHz edges
    low level QRM      │        Medium Bandwidth
                  0V ──┴───     Medium level QRM

   The output fast edge shape is often wanted, but power rail noise is not.

   Filtering is normally provided on the power rails to provide an on PCB path
   for these high pulse currents..
                                                 PCB    ANT
                                                 \│/    \│/
   +5V ──┬─────┬───                        5V ──┬─┴───┬──┴──
         │     │_           But due to          )     │_
        ===   │  `\         PCB track       1uH )    │  `\
     10n │  ──┤Gate├──      lengths this        )   ─┤Gate├──
         │    │__./         often looks     10n │    │__./
         │     │            like this...       ===    │     \│/
     0V──┴─────┴───                        0v ──┴─────┴──────┴──

   One cure is to put a C directly across any noisy ICs, these can identified
   by scopeing the power rails on a PCB looking for the worst RF noise sources.

   Then putting a Cs (surface mount?) across the power pins without loads of
   track en-route.... Cs of 10n-10u in the right place can make a huge
   difference to power rail noise radiation.

         PCB    ANT
         \│/    \│/ Much less
   5V ──┬─┴───┬──┴── RF Noise
        )  ┌──┤_     on PCB     It is not usually possible to
    1uH ) ===│  `\              add extra L to the PCB power
        )  │ ┤Gate├──           rails to help the decoupling.
    10n │  │ │__./
       === └──┤     \│/
   0V ──┴─────┴──────┴──

   Data bus radiation is more difficult to cure as there are more lines & the
   RF power level is normally quite low from any particular line.

   But filtering of a R or LC is sometimes effective (e.g. on a PC printer
   port), but both type must consider the timing delay & loss & any undamped
   resonance on the data line.

      __   QRM                 __     Much less        __     Very little
     │  `\  \│/               │  `\      \│/          │  `\       \│/
   ──┤Gate├──┴─              ─┤Gate├─100─┬┴─         ─┤Gate├─((()─┬┴─> Z load
     │__./  ___ 1MHz          │__./      | stray      │__./   L   │
      │    │   │___│           │        === C          │    1uH  === 1n
   ───┴──────                ──┴─────────┴──          ─┴──────────┴─

   Noise Sources have less       With R C the RF         With L & C the
   dB     than -6dB/Octave       Harmonics drop          Harmonics drop
   │ │   | for odd harmonics     @ 12dB/O after          @ 18dB/O after
   │ │   │   │   |               -3dB point              the damped
   │ │   │   │   │   │   |       where Xc=R              resonant Freq.
   └─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  11 MHz

   The actual radiation from PCB track is proportional to the frequency in
   addition to any resonant track. So a 1MHz square wave may be very weak at
   11MHz as the PCB track length is very small compared to a 1/4 wave, but
   radiate quite loudly at 50 to 144MHz where the track becomes a good aerial.

   These principles also apply to SMPSUs as well as TV/Monitor Line stages,
   just that it is very difficult to apply in those high power cases.

   Quite often to save money makers drop the use of RFI components in mains
   SMPSU. e.g. they have bought in GREY illegal imports of unfiltered SMPSU, &
   put them in their PCs etc. hoping no one will notice! If you have a look
   look inside one of these offending PSUs you will see the straps that bridge
   out the missing C-L-C mains filter.

              GOOD FILTER                            NO FILTER!
   L >───┬────┬──┐   ┌────┬─> to Bridge     L >──┬────┬──----───┬──> to Bridge
     2n7===   │  (((()    │   Rectifier         ???   │  wire   │    Rectifier
         │   === =====   ===  Smoothing          │   ??? links ???   Smoothing
   E >───┤ 4n7│  (((() 4n7│   & HF          E >──┤    │         │    & HF
     2n7===   │  │   │    │   Switching         ???   │         │    Switching
   N >───┴────┴──┘   └────┴─> device        N >──┴────┴──----───┴──> device
               balance                         Mains QRM 80dB worse!
            ferrite choke

   As the ferrite & mains rated caps are relatively expensive, quite a saving
   is made. But as the main smoothing capacitor ages & dries out, its' ability
   to suppress HF on the HT rail is greatly reduced & QRM levels reaching the
   mains can only get worse! Some SMPSU carry on working fine with no mains
   DC smoothing C !!

   If your track down a new example of this practice, your local radio
   administration/RFI enforcement body should be informed, & if they are on
   the ball (some could not care these days) a prosecution could result.

2/ Applies the last filtering principle to the whole noise source..

              RF proof
              Metal Box
   Filter    ┌────────┐      little
   All leads │ NOISE  │      \│/ RF
     ─┬─()))─┤ SOURCE ├─()))─┬┴──
     ===     └────┬───┘     ===
    ──┴───────────┴──────────┴───

   You can see this approach used on all PCs nowadays in an attempt to meet not
   very stringent the RFI laws. Ferrites are used on all leads close to any
   noise source box to reduce (but not eliminate!) any currents flowing into
   the leads & reduce them acting as aerials.

   Full screening is often not used due to dangerous voltages screen needs to
   be see etc. But it may also be left off due to cost, & design / aesthetics /
   sales considerations. e.g. a metal box around an RF economy lamp. :-)

   For TV -> HF QRM, consider the UHF aerial system as a HF aerial, put a HF
   braid breaker in the aerial & ferrites on the mains lead etc. as these
   filters work both for Tx & Rx QRM.

   If QRM source items in 1 or 2 are not yours, then modification can be risky
   & unadvisable!

   I have heard of hams with interference cases, who are prepared to buy a
   neighbour a brand new TV etc. to solve the problem. But note well, modern
   items can be a lot worse than some older designs! e.g. low voltage 12V
   lighting now uses 80kHz 150W square wave power inverters with radiating
   unscreened leads, rather than a straight forward 50Hz transformer!


3/ Reducing the QRM seen by the Rx can be simple or hard to achieve depending
   on the location etc.

  a) If it is yours, turn the QRM source off. (TV / PC / RF lamp)

  b) Prove the path of the QRM to the Rx, e.g. not 12V pick up/mains pick up.
     Put the Rx on battery, or via wound up extension lead to test. If not down
     the aerial, then filter mains/other leads.

     For UHF/VHF QRM try braid cover leads of 1/4 wave long bonded to Rx earth.

      \│/        ┌────┐
       └─────════Á Rx Ă════───DC
                 └────┘

  c) Increase the distance from Rx aerial to the QRM source. Move TV/ Aerials.
     True RF fields die away @ the square law e.g. 6dB per doubling distance.
     But near fields with transformer/stray capacitance coupling like TVs
     timebase etc. obey a cube law. e.g. 9dB per doubling of distance.

  d) If QRM is steady & only from one source, it can be nulled out with a 2nd
     aerial & phase/amplitude system.

                      Noise Cancel
      Main \│/          ┌─────┐
       Ant  └───────────┤Phase│  ┌────┐
             Noise \│/  │  &  ├─>┤ Rx │
              Ant   └───┤Level│  └────┘
                        └─────┘

4/ Operate when the QRM is not there. Operate on bands/frequencies unaffected.

   Or filter it out after/in the Rx.

   Impulse Noise gates or blankers were the 1st attempt to do this, they remove
   car ignition & spiky mains noise quite well on SSB mode.

                      20kHz                      2.3kHz
          ┌──────┐  ┌──────┐         ┌──────┐   ┌─────┐
   SSB +> │ Mixer├>─┤ WIDE ├─┬────>──┤ GATE ├─>─┤ SSB ├──> No
   Spikes └──────┘  │  IF  │ │    _  └──┬───┘   │ IF  │  Spikes
                    └──────┘ │ │\ /|   ===      └─────┘
                        Noise└─┤/`>─DET┬┘Spike
                          amp /│/──────┘
                                Fast AGC

   The noise amp AGC is fast enough (300uS) to follow a single SSB voice
   envelope, maintaining a fairly steady RF signal. When a wideband spike
   occurs the rise time is too fast & it produces an AGC spike that is used
   to turn off the IF gate to the narrow SSB filter. The result is very narrow
   holes (e.g. 1mS) in the audio rather than loud clicks, that could also have
   turned the Rx AGC down as well. Drawbacks are if there are too many stations
   in the passband or big signals (e.g. contests) the noise amp miss operates
   the gate making signals break up or sound very wide.

   Try a modern noise DSP processing in or after the Rx, as much of some types
   of QRM can be 99% removed without too much loss of intelligence in the Dx
   signal underneath. One external "add on DSP LS system" I tested with a
   steady carrier noise was reduced by 65dB automatically at the max noise
   reduction setting, or 35dB for more broadband noises.

                         ________ 
   Signal > \│/ ┌────┐  │ D.S.P. │ 99% of
    + QRM >  └──┤ Rx ├──┤NOISE LS│ Signal >
                └────┘  │ SYSTEM │
                        └────────┘

   It works by digitally analysing the AF spectrum into 100s of narrow
   frequency bands, with an "FM noise squelch" system on each one, deciding if
   the signal in the band is significantly above the noise to let through. If
   the level on any band has not changed after 2 seconds ignore that band.

   The drawback is that a voice with high levels of noise will sound like a
   nasty cellphone call at high noise reduction levels, as the voice pitch to
   allow through may be the wrong one!


When living with QRM, remember that our hobby is just a good a pastime a any
other. So you don't have to put up with it really. If you can, get help to get
the problem sorted. Try an intermediary, local radio club, radio authority,
other radio users affected? (e.g. police, ambulance, aircraft, broadcast bands
etc). This can all help if you can find the right person to take up the case.
Remember too loose plugs & wires/screws can be a QRM cause & fire hazard too.  

However Andy G0FTD reminded me that this hobby is protected by:-

DIRECTIVE 2004/108/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT & OF THE COUNCIL
of 15 December 2004 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States
relating to electromagnetic compatibility & repealing Directive 89/336/EEC.

Where Amateur radio is _specifically_ mentioned/protected.


See my bul "Stopping HF Tx/Rx SMPSU QRM", "Mains Plugtop Filter Adaptor" &
"Clip on QRM Probe", "Smart Meter Refusal".


Why don't U send an interest bul?

73 de John G8MNY @ GB7CIP


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 16.10.2018 01:11:43lGo Back Go up